Boston Car Accident Lawyer Blog

According to a recent article in the Boston Herald, Jalen Saunders, a rookie wide receiver who plays for the New York Jets, was in a single vehicle crash. He is reported to be in the hospital for observation, and there has been no word on the seriousness of his injuries. He is expected to miss at least one preseason game due to his hospitalization.

As our Boston car accident attorneys understand, single vehicle accidents can pose unique challenges to an injured victim. First, it should be noted that just because there was only one vehicle that crashed, does not mean that it was the injured driver’s fault.

Often times a driver will act in a manner that causes another driver to crash without crashing his or her own vehicle. We tend to see this when a driver weaves or makes an unsafe lane change, or even drives the wrong way down a street, causing another vehicle to take evasive action. Swerving out the way may lead to running off the road and crashing into an object like a utility pole or having a rollover accident.
Continue reading

As your Boston car accident lawyer can explain, insurance companies will often engage in substantial litigation to avoid paying claims.

Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. MMG Insurance Co. involved a car passenger who suffered severe personal injuries as a result of a motor vehicle accident. Those injuries cost him much more than $500,000, which was the policy limit on the vehicle
The victim’s mother owned the car. The driver of the car was the sole person liable for the single-car crash.
Continue reading

Our Boston car accident lawyers know defendants will file pre-trial motions to dismiss in nearly all negligence cases.

In the Estate of Edmund M. Carman v. Tinkes, the plaintiff’s car crashed into the back of the defendant’s commercial pickup truck. According to court records, the plaintiff was driving his car early one morning before dawn. He did not have his headlights on and was driving in what was described as a “quick” manner.

When the plaintiff approached a red traffic signal, he did not attempt to stop or slow down. Instead, he crashed into the back of a large commercial pickup truck driven by the defendant. The plaintiff’s car was completely destroyed in the accident, and the plaintiff was killed.
Continue reading

According to a recent story from WMUR, a Massachusetts woman crashed her Honda Civic into a recreational vehicle (RV) on Route 9. The Civic was traveling on Route 9 when it allegedly crossed into the other lane and struck the RV, according to police. The RV was built in 1974 and obviously lacked some of the safety equipment found on modern vehicles.

Tragically, the driver of the Civic and her two passengers were killed in this accident. The driver of the RV was taken to a hospital to be treated for serious but non-fatal injuries. A passenger in the RV was also killed in the accident. The RV was also towing a car that was destroyed in the accident. 

While it is known that the Civic hit the RV, police have not concluded who was ultimately responsible for the deadly motor vehicle crash and are continuing to investigate.

As your Boston car accident attorney can explain, cases involving the deaths of both the plaintiff and defendant typically require extra attention. First, the plaintiff’s surviving heirs (family members) will need to open a probate estate. The probate process is designed to pay any final debts of the decedent’s estate and distribute any assets remaining in the estate.
Continue reading

In Floyd-Tunnell v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co., an appeal argued in the Missouri Supreme Court, the plaintiff’s husband was killed in a car crash with an at-fault driver who did not have car insurance. As your Boston car accident lawyer can explain, courts refer to this type of driver as an uninsured motorist (UM).

At the time this fatal car accident occurred, the plaintiff and her husband were the named insured drivers on three liability policies for three vehicles that they owned. All three car insurance policies where purchased with the same carrier. Each of these policies provided UM limits of $100,000.

UM coverage is a type of insurance that a driver can purchase to cover himself or herself in the event of an accident with someone who does not have car insurance. While it is illegal to drive without car insurance, many people are out on the roads with no insurance every day. In the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, driving an uninsured motor vehicle is a crime punishable by up to a year in the house of corrections.

If someone who does not have insurance hits you, and you have UM coverage, the idea is that your insurance will pay you for your losses up to the limits of your UM insurance. If you have more than one vehicle, you may be able to apply the coverage from those other vehicles through what is called the stacking of UM coverage. In other words, if you are in an accident with an uninsured motorist, and you have $30,000 of UM coverage on the car you are driving, you could get that money to help with the losses you experienced from the car accident. If you have another car at home with UM coverage, you could possibly get that $30,000, as well, by stacking the two UM plans together.
Continue reading

According to a recent article from Boston.com, a clown suffered what is being reported as minor injuries when she crashed her clown car into a utility pole. The woman was driving home from a show at a local elementary school and was still wearing her clown makeup and costume.

Approximately 10 of her friends (also clowns) arrived on scene to help the woman. It is alleged that the victim was attempting to operate her GPS and was looking away from the road when she ran into the utility pole. As noted by the author of the article, her friends drove away from the accident in separate cars instead of all crowding into the tiny clown car.

While this story ended without any significant injuries, our Boston car accident lawyers know that distracted drivers cause many serious and sometimes fatal car accidents each year. According to statistical information provided by the US. Government, in 2012, it was estimated that more than 420,000 people were injured car accidents caused by distracted drivers. The number of distracted driving-related fatalities that year was around 3,300 people.
Continue reading

Inman v. Boykin, an appeal heard in the Supreme Court of Wyoming, involved a driver of a rental car who was allegedly driving in a negligent manner and crashed into another vehicle.

The first issue that arose is that the plaintiff filed the lawsuit against the both the driver and the rental car company. As your Boston car accident lawyer can explain, there is often an issue as to who is a proper party to the action in the case of a rental van or truck. There tend to be a lot of accidents in rental moving trucks because drivers are not properly trained and generally lack experience driving such large vehicles.

In Inman, the plaintiff filed the lawsuit against both defendants but did not immediately serve the either party. The plaintiff was having difficulty serving the defendants and moved for additional time for service. The trial court granted the plaintiff an additional 120 days to serve the plaintiff, based upon excusable neglect.

The plaintiff eventually served the defendant with an out-of-state summons form that was not properly authorized by the clerk of court. The defendant moved to dismiss on grounds that service was improper and that the plaintiff was time-barred from filing a civil lawsuit. The plaintiff filed a reply, but the court dismissed the plaintiff’s case with prejudice.
Continue reading