Boston Car Accident Lawyer Blog

According to a recent article from Boston.com, a clown suffered what is being reported as minor injuries when she crashed her clown car into a utility pole. The woman was driving home from a show at a local elementary school and was still wearing her clown makeup and costume.

Approximately 10 of her friends (also clowns) arrived on scene to help the woman. It is alleged that the victim was attempting to operate her GPS and was looking away from the road when she ran into the utility pole. As noted by the author of the article, her friends drove away from the accident in separate cars instead of all crowding into the tiny clown car.

While this story ended without any significant injuries, our Boston car accident lawyers know that distracted drivers cause many serious and sometimes fatal car accidents each year. According to statistical information provided by the US. Government, in 2012, it was estimated that more than 420,000 people were injured car accidents caused by distracted drivers. The number of distracted driving-related fatalities that year was around 3,300 people.
Continue reading

Inman v. Boykin, an appeal heard in the Supreme Court of Wyoming, involved a driver of a rental car who was allegedly driving in a negligent manner and crashed into another vehicle.

The first issue that arose is that the plaintiff filed the lawsuit against the both the driver and the rental car company. As your Boston car accident lawyer can explain, there is often an issue as to who is a proper party to the action in the case of a rental van or truck. There tend to be a lot of accidents in rental moving trucks because drivers are not properly trained and generally lack experience driving such large vehicles.

In Inman, the plaintiff filed the lawsuit against both defendants but did not immediately serve the either party. The plaintiff was having difficulty serving the defendants and moved for additional time for service. The trial court granted the plaintiff an additional 120 days to serve the plaintiff, based upon excusable neglect.

The plaintiff eventually served the defendant with an out-of-state summons form that was not properly authorized by the clerk of court. The defendant moved to dismiss on grounds that service was improper and that the plaintiff was time-barred from filing a civil lawsuit. The plaintiff filed a reply, but the court dismissed the plaintiff’s case with prejudice.
Continue reading

According to a recent story in the Boston Herald, a car containing three people crashed into a Boston Fire Department station located in the Charlestown neighborhood of the city. Emergency personnel were able to quickly respond to the vehicle and transport the three occupants to a local hospital. Two of the people in the car were reported as being in life-threatening condition due to their substantial injuries.

The vehicle reportedly hit a gas pump located at the fire station. The pump was damaged but, luckily, there was not a gasoline leak that could have caused an explosion or fire. Firefighters used the Jaws of Life to cut the victims out of the car. Authorities have not released a cause of the accident.

Our Boston car accident attorneys understand that a single-vehicle accident caused by a negligent driver may result in serious personal injuries to passengers. These injured passengers may be required to file a personal injury claim against the driver.
Continue reading

Our Boston car accident lawyers know that victims of traffic collisions can get caught in the middle of a fight between doctors and insurance companies who are more concerned with making money than helping accident victims.

MI Spine & Brain Surgeons, PLLC v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., an appeal from the U.S. Sixth Circuit, involves a lawsuit between a surgical clinic and their patient’s car insurance company. According to court records, the car accident victim sustained injures that required more than $26,000 in neurological treatment.

The doctor’s office submitted the bill to the car insurance company, but the company rejected the claim. The reason for the rejection was that the medical condition for which the patient was treated was not related to any injuries sustained in the car accident. The insurance company alleged that their insured was suffering from a preexisting condition that was not covered under the policy.
Continue reading

Our Boston car accident lawyers regularly handle cases involving hit-and-run drivers and know that these situations often require the assistance of a crash investigator.

According to a recent article in the Boston Globe, a man from Chelsea is alleged to have made an improper lane change while speeding on the lower level of the Tobin Bridge.

The Massachusetts State Police reported the driver caused a three-car accident on the bridge and then fled the scene on foot, leaving a female passenger in his own vehicle. The two other cars involved in the accident contained a total of two children and five adults who were taken to Massachusetts General Hospital for their injures.

While the at-fault driver did not stay on the scene, the police were easily able to obtain his identification from his passenger and vehicle and have issued a summons to court to address charges related this hit-and-run accident.
Continue reading

Our Boston car accident lawyers know traffic accidents are seldom “accidents.”

According to a recent report in the Boston Globe, four people were injured in a head-on collision in East Dennis, Massachusetts. Police are saying that the driver of one of the vehicles involved in the crash drifted over the center line and hit another vehicle carrying three people.

The driver of the vehicle alleged to be at-fault suffered severe injuries to her chest and abdomen and was flown in a medevac helicopter to a trauma center. The driver of the other vehicle suffered serious injuries to her head and neck. In addition to the serious injures sustained by the driver, her two young grandchildren suffered what are being reported as minor injuries from the car accident.
Continue reading

In Carter v. Progressive Mountain Ins., the Supreme Court of Georgia explored the issue of whether Underinsured Motorist (UM) coverage could based upon the wording of a settlement with the at-fault driver’s insurance company.

In Carter, the plaintiff was in a car accident that was allegedly caused by an intoxicated driver. The drunk driver had a policy with a maximum of $30,000 in coverage per personal injury. The plaintiff entered into a settlement with the at-fault driver’s carrier in the amount of thirty thousand dollars. However, the settlement agreement provided that $29,000 of the settlement payment would be for punitive damages and the remaining $1,000 would be for compensatory damages.

The plaintiff then filed with her own insurance carrier to collect on her UM policy. She had a UM policy in the amount of $25,000. As your Boston car accident lawyer can explain, UM coverage can be purchased from your own insurance company and is designed to compensate you for any damages that are over and above what is paid by the at-fault driver’s insurance company.
Continue reading